Risks of Infrequent Backup Testingīolster your cyber resilience by augmenting the frequency of your backup testing. These overlooked corrupted files become ticking time bombs in your backup system, ready to compromise your recovery when you least expect it. Similarly, overlooking a corrupted file during a manual random sampling check is all too easy, especially when handling vast amounts of data. Imagine discovering, during a critical recovery operation, that the backup you thought was reliable is in fact either outdated or irrelevant. It might sound trivial, but it can have far-reaching consequences. One common mistake is testing the wrong backup. Let’s now take a look at the dangers of human errors that can occur in the manual testing process. More than that, this additional load on your IT personnel may lead to burnout, affecting their overall performance and the efficiency of your IT infrastructure. In many instances, manual backup testing requires your system administrators or MSPs to work outside of regular business hours, significantly increasing operational costs. If your aim is to streamline your business processes in order to save time and reduce costs, then manually testing your backups tends to hinder this objective. The traditional method of manually testing your backups is more than just time-consuming – it can cause disruptions in your business operations. In this article, we explore why regular testing of backups is crucial and how the Test Restore feature in BackupAssist Classic v12 makes it effortlessly achievable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |